Description
Students develop a deeper understanding of ideas put forward in the student essays, "Why A Plantation?" and "Why A Factory?" after reading the rules governing work used on two plantations and two factories during the 19th century. They then compare the rules in a class discussion using included questions as a guide.
Duration (approximate): 2 1/2 class periods
Learning Outcomes and Skills
What You Will Need
Additional Information
It is important to remember when
reading these documents that rules tell us what the people in
charge thought life should be like, rather than what really happened.
Conditions on many plantations and factories were probably more
brutal and exhausting than these rules would suggest. Reports
surfaced periodically in the North of factory workers (especially
children) who were beaten by overseers or who collapsed from exhaustion.
In the South, slaves were not only beaten, but murdered by both
owners and overseers.
However, while rules don't tell us
what really happened, they do allow us to look at how employers
and masters tried to shape the way those under their control lived
and worked. As the introductory essays note, both cotton plantations
and textile factories needed strict rules of discipline. Moreover,
both factory owners and masters felt that those who worked for
them needed direction and protection. This exemplifies the paternalism
that was mentioned in the essays. On the other hand, slaves were
property, so owners had greater power over the bodies of slaves
than mill owners had over their workers. Thus, masters write
more freely of physical discipline, on the one hand, and attending
to the health of slaves, on the other.
Discussion Questions with Possible
Responses
Students might note that a worker's time was extremely regimented in factories, but that plantations were also supposed to run by the clock. This makes us realize that the concern about using a worker's time is not simply a result of technology and for factory production, but that it is related to a concern for profits and demands of the market which existed in both the North and the South.
Note that plantation rules are addressed to overseers while factory rules are addressed to employees. Workers in the North are talked to, slaves in the South are talked about. Students might think about why this is so. In part this difference is probably due to the fact that factory operatives were more likely to be able to read than slaves were. Indeed, slaves were often forbidden by law to learn how to read. But there is also the possibility that the failure to address slaves reflected expectations on the part of masters different from those of factory owners when it came to their work forces.
Masters feel they have the right to control the bodies of their slaves because they own them. Slaves, rather than machinery, are a major capital investment and this investment is managed in a way that workers are not.
Students might think about if and why rules
are necessary, what is a fair rule, and who should make rules.
They might also ask themselves if schools are modeled on factories!
Comments and questions to
the Lemelson Center:lemcen@si.edu
Last Revision: 6/15/98