Notes from the Director: Eco-Cities :: Smithsonian Lemelson Center
Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation, Smithsonian Beanie Illustration
SEARCH:
About Us

« Back to "Online articles" menu

<empty>

Arthur Molella, Jerome and Dorothy Lemelson Director

As Earth Day approaches on April 22, I find myself reflecting on Inventing for the Environment (MIT Press, 2003), a volume that the Lemelson Center produced a few years ago. I do so in the conviction that its theme looms even larger today than it did when the book first came out. Countering the view that technology only disrupts natural processes, our book’s contributors focused on inventors and innovators who have devoted their imaginations to shaping a better environmental future. Their efforts ranged from innovations in city planning, urban sanitation, and the emerging practice of industrial ecology to technologies on a more individual scale, like straw-bale buildings and high-tech "hypercars."

Today, the buzz is all about "sustainability," with an emphasis on alternative energies, renewable resources, and carbon-neutral technologies. Sustainability, however, has taken on a whole new dimension with the rise of the eco-city concept, a development that I mentioned in a prior column on new technology towns. I say "concept" because, although the idea has been around for at least a couple of decades, no eco-city has yet been fully realized.

As defined by the visionary urban ecologist Richard Register, eco-cities are designed to be in balance with nature. Actually they come in many sizes and flavors, including retrofitted derelict industrial areas and small eco-villages, as in the plans for "Bicycle City"--a particular favorite of mine. The most fascinating variety, however, is the attempt to build completely new cities on the principle of total environmental sustainability. Using the most advanced technologies (including some not even invented yet), these new cities are meant to be completely self-sufficient. Each will generate its own power, grow its own food, and recycle its water, while minimizing to near zero the output of waste, especially CO2. 

Two of the most extravagant projects currently on the books are Masdar in Abu Dhabi of the United Arab Emirates and Dongtan in China. Abu Dhabi is touting Masdar as the "greenest city on earth," eventually a zero-carbon footprint town of 50,000 inhabitants and 1,500 businesses. Most spectacularly, the city is built on a plinth or platform, with all the infrastructure and transportation concealed beneath. Competing with Masdar for the title of the world’s first fully realized eco-city is Dongtan, about twenty-five miles from Shanghai. The city will produce its own energy through wind, sun, biofuel, and recycled waste, including human sewage.

Both projects pose formidable environmental challenges. The green city of Masdar sits in the middle of a desert and Dongtan on a major wetland. Their very concept raises a host of questions and issues, but the central ones are these: Although real money has been put behind these projects, how real are they? In the end, is ultimate sustainability really sustainable? Some say they are exciting new directions, but others claim that, in the case of Masdar, the eco-city diverts attention away from Abu Dhabi’s petroleum industry, and, with Dongtan, China creates a fig leaf for its polluted metropolises. Even if they prove to be extravagant diversions, attempts to build the sustainable city, even attempts with flaws, may provide the real-life experience needed to make our planning richer, more oriented to the fuller urban life so necessary for true sustainability.

From Prototype, April 2009

<empty>
:: Home :: About Us :: Centerpieces :: Events :: Resources :: Video & Audio ::
:: Press Room :: Blog :: Newsletter :: Site Map :: Facebook :: Flickr :: Twitter ::
Smithsonian